case study: couvent sainte-marie de la tourette
case study: couvent sainte-marie de la tourette
case study: couvent sainte-marie de la tourette
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>case</strong> <strong>study</strong>: <strong>couvent</strong> <strong>sainte</strong>-<strong>marie</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> <strong>tourette</strong><br />
DAVID JENISTA<br />
LE CORBUSIER and IANNIS XENAKIS 1953-1960
“To house one hundred hearts and<br />
one hundred bodies in silence”<br />
form<br />
The above were the words of Dominican<br />
Father Marie-A<strong>la</strong>in Couturier; his commission's<br />
essence offered to friend and architect<br />
Le Corbusier for a monastery to house one<br />
hundred Dominican monks. Couvent Sainte-<br />
Marie <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> Tourette (henceforth La Tourette)<br />
was consi<strong>de</strong>red to be of a genius nature and<br />
in or<strong>de</strong>r to un<strong>de</strong>rstand the form, or rather<br />
forms, we must examine Le Corbusier's i<strong>de</strong>as<br />
on architecture as well as the culture and social<br />
customs of the Dominican lifestyle. We<br />
will also see that the genius of the form meets<br />
the theoretical standards of other architects.<br />
As Le Corbusier states in terms of mass: Architecture<br />
is the masterly, correct and magnificent p<strong>la</strong>y<br />
of masses brought together in light. Our eyes are<br />
ma<strong>de</strong> to see forms in light; light and sha<strong>de</strong> reveal<br />
these forms; cubes, cones, spheres, cylin<strong>de</strong>rs or<br />
pyramids are the great primary forms which light<br />
reveals to advantage; the image of these is distinct<br />
and tangible within us and without ambiguity.<br />
It is for that reason that these are beautiful<br />
forms, the most beautiful forms. (Le Corbusier, 29)
gol<strong>de</strong>n section diagram<br />
It is suggested that impure forms would <strong>de</strong>tract<br />
from the beauty of a building while also<br />
<strong>de</strong>terring us from maximally experiencing<br />
the spaces within it. Le Corbusier's "geometric<br />
rule of the building encompasses the<br />
un<strong>de</strong>rlying forms of prismatic solids, [and]<br />
the application of Modulor measurements<br />
[is attributed] to many aspects of the interior"<br />
(Gans, 101). The Modulor was a system<br />
of proportion, of Le Corbusier's <strong>de</strong>sign,<br />
based on human measurements, the double<br />
unit, the Fibonacci numbers, and the gol<strong>de</strong>n<br />
ratio. It was the Modulor merged with the<br />
musical compositions of Corbusier's project<br />
manager, Iannis Xenakis, that dictated the<br />
<strong>la</strong>nguage of the pans <strong>de</strong> verre ondu<strong>la</strong>toires,<br />
the pinwheel fenestrations, and other proportions<br />
of the monastery. It is the success<br />
of the pure forms in conjunction with Le Corbusier's<br />
expert experimentation with light<br />
and proportion that allow the monks to experience<br />
La Tourette for its function in a lucid<br />
manner rather than through the distraction<br />
of what could be termed 'impure forms.'<br />
On a much smaller scale of form, because<br />
La Tourette was partially cast in p<strong>la</strong>ce, it becomes<br />
necessary to <strong>de</strong>pict how some acci<strong>de</strong>ntal<br />
forms came to be. While Le Corbusier was<br />
certainly not a fanatic of the Gothic style he<br />
did recognize that "entrusting the physical expression<br />
of his <strong>de</strong>sign to those building it was<br />
at once a logical acceptance of circumstance<br />
and a romantic act based on a neo-Gothic trust<br />
in the re<strong>la</strong>tion of the workman to the work"<br />
(Gans, 102). This notion is more evi<strong>de</strong>nt when
we consi<strong>de</strong>r Ruskin's i<strong>de</strong>a that forms were not limited by a master p<strong>la</strong>n and that the form<br />
as <strong>de</strong>rived at the hands of man; "utterly regardless of any established conventionalities<br />
of external appearance, knowing [...] that such daring interruptions of the formal p<strong>la</strong>n<br />
would rather give additional interest to its symmetry than injure it" (Ruskin, 168-169).<br />
Le Corbusier, through his dialectic of dualities, sought to celebrate the variances and<br />
mistakes of human error that inevitably contributed to the genius of the final product.<br />
possible window configurations based on musical scores<br />
GLYCERINE bush (gavin rossdale)<br />
J’AVAIS UN AMOUR AUTREFOIS iannis xenakis<br />
RIVER FLOWS IN YOU yiruma<br />
THE VOICE WITHIN christina aguilera & glen bal<strong>la</strong>rd<br />
In terms of the monastic lifestyle we can see that the traditional spaces of the cloister<br />
exist as the monks expressed their needs but, "the form and space distribution was<br />
left up to Le Corbusier" (Henze, 8). Le Corbusier had visited several abbeys, both in<br />
his past and in preparation for the project at hand, that left him an incredible un<strong>de</strong>rstanding<br />
and appreciation for the monastic lifestyle. He felt the monks exhibited an<br />
"'indissoluble binomial of the individual-collective'" (Gans, 103). Le Corbusier sought<br />
to embody t and materially minimalist lifestyle of the monks through a series of dualities,<br />
his own personal dialectic: Individual-collective; light-dark; secu<strong>la</strong>r-religious;<br />
lucid-obscure; temporal-permanent; incremental-continuous; rational-irrational; architecture-nature;<br />
high-low. These dualities combined with Le Corbusier's incredible<br />
un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the monks' daily life generated a series of forms in an almost harsh<br />
contrast to one another that expressed his notion of pure and beautiful geometries.
individual :: collective<br />
incremental :: continuous<br />
secu<strong>la</strong>r :: religious<br />
formative binomial dialectic<br />
dark :: light<br />
high :: low<br />
lucid :: obscure<br />
nature :: architecture<br />
irrational :: rational<br />
individual :: collective
I wish to venture to compare the genius of<br />
La Tourette to the theoretical standards of<br />
Paul Rudolph and his six <strong>de</strong>terminants of<br />
architectural form. The following examination<br />
seeks to pull minimal examples from<br />
La Tourette and should offer a glimpse<br />
into the specific forms of the structure.<br />
First Determinant: Building's Environment<br />
In re<strong>la</strong>tion to the site, Le Corbusier<br />
sought to separate the building from the hillsi<strong>de</strong><br />
in an effort to dominate the surrounding<br />
nature to reinforce his dialectic of dualities<br />
which reiterates Rudolph's thought that<br />
"religious buildings [...] should serve as focal<br />
points in our cities" (Rudolph, 213).<br />
Second Determinant: Function<br />
By reducing La Tourette to a mere<br />
function with no excesses and the maximization<br />
of circu<strong>la</strong>tion, the form that took shape<br />
reflected both traditional monastic values<br />
and Le Corbusier's personal i<strong>de</strong>as and theories.<br />
Interestingly enough, La Tourette exceedingly<br />
satisfies Rudolph's i<strong>de</strong>a that the<br />
building should be regar<strong>de</strong>d as whole in how<br />
it works.<br />
Third Determinant: Particu<strong>la</strong>r Site Conditions<br />
Simply enough the building responds<br />
to sun patterns, access to the site, and location<br />
and positioning in re<strong>la</strong>tion to the surrounding<br />
forest and valleys. The summer<br />
solstice generated the forms of the sacristy<br />
light cannons.<br />
Fourth Determinant: Materials<br />
In or<strong>de</strong>r to ren<strong>de</strong>r the abbey affordable<br />
while reflecting the simple and non-<br />
materialistic nature of the monks, Le Corbusier<br />
resolved to use both precast and cast in p<strong>la</strong>ce<br />
concrete. The monolithic nature of the form is<br />
reinforced by the materiality in that it expresses<br />
the building's eloquence and true nature, as<br />
Rudolph suggests it should.<br />
Fifth Determinant: Psychology<br />
Rudolph believes that this <strong>de</strong>terminant<br />
is achieved "through the manipu<strong>la</strong>tion of space<br />
and the use of symbols" (Rudolph, 214). The<br />
oratory column and the main ambu<strong>la</strong>tory are<br />
cruciform in nature and thus symbolize the religious<br />
nature of La Tourette.<br />
Sixth Determinant: Spirit of the Time<br />
Here is where I believe La Tourette does<br />
not measure up with Rudolph's values. Not in<br />
the sense that Le Corbusier was wrong in his<br />
<strong>de</strong>sign, but because he was correct. It could<br />
be argued that Le Corbusier was not concerned<br />
with the spirit of the times. He merely wished<br />
to convey a building through a binomial <strong>la</strong>nguage<br />
that reflected the values and needs of<br />
the Dominicans. The form of La Tourette is not<br />
troubled with the i<strong>de</strong>as of an outsi<strong>de</strong> society<br />
and so I dare to suggest that it ren<strong>de</strong>rs Rudolph's<br />
sixth <strong>de</strong>terminant irrelevant.<br />
body<br />
Now that we have discussed La Tourette in<br />
terms of form we must consi<strong>de</strong>r the body;<br />
the building as a p<strong>la</strong>ce to house one hundred<br />
healthy bodies and a strcuture that is ‘ma<strong>de</strong>’ up<br />
of one hundred (or more) bodies. In “The Medical<br />
Body in Mo<strong>de</strong>rn Archtiecture,” by Beatriz<br />
Colomina, we find that Le Corbusier believes<br />
the “house is first and foremost a machine for
personal barrier<br />
sun<br />
view<br />
venti<strong>la</strong>tion<br />
the healthy body and the cell<br />
he believed disease was bred. Furthermore,<br />
he reiterated a healthy body by incorporating<br />
the roof gar<strong>de</strong>n where the monks could get<br />
exercise. Le Corbusier so strongly believed in<br />
a healthy body in architecture that even the<br />
monks’ cells in La Tourette mimic this notion.<br />
The cells are completely private (unless one<br />
were to invite another in), including the balconies.<br />
They offer cross venti<strong>la</strong>tion from the<br />
balconies into the halls through operable louvers.<br />
Every room looks out into nature and<br />
so each room receives sun light, air, and a<br />
view. I touched on this in terms of form, but<br />
Corbusier <strong>de</strong>signed the monastery around a<br />
series of daulities. The dua<strong>la</strong>ity of individual<br />
versus collective offers an extensive set of<br />
options in La Tourette where bodies become<br />
more <strong>de</strong>nsified or released throughout. If we<br />
extend Corbusier’s obsession to a healthy<br />
mind, we have only to offer one of many examples.<br />
People who have visited La Tourette<br />
have said that the building is anything but<br />
dreary and so we may suggest that the building<br />
bolsters the healthy body and mind. But<br />
now let us look at the Modulor.<br />
health, a form of therapy” (Colomina, 232).<br />
Clearly we are not un<strong>de</strong>r the impression<br />
that La Tourette is a house, but Corbusier’s<br />
five points of architecture, and his apparent<br />
obsession with health, as <strong>de</strong>scribed by<br />
Colomina, offer insight into La Tourette as<br />
a healthy ‘home’ for one hundred monks.<br />
“Le Corbusier has long been obsessed with<br />
health,” (Colomina, 232) and so La Tourette<br />
was raised from the ground in an effort to remove<br />
the inhabitants from the ground where<br />
concentration of bodies in space
At one point Colomina offers that Le Corbusier and his colleagues removed the body as a symbol<br />
and something that occupies architecture and rep<strong>la</strong>ced it as a body that informs architecture.<br />
This is Le Corbusier’s Modulor and it can only be <strong>de</strong>scribed as a genius proportioning system,<br />
and as previously discussed it was based on human measurements, the double unit, the Fibonacci<br />
numbers, and the gol<strong>de</strong>n ratio.<br />
Primitive men at all times and in all p<strong>la</strong>ces, as also the bearers of high civilization, Egyptian, Chal<strong>de</strong>an, Greek, all<br />
these have built and, by that token, measured. What were the tools they used? They were eternal and enduring,<br />
precious because they were linked to the human person. The names of these tools were: elbow (cubit),<br />
finger (digit), thumb (inch), foot, pace, and so forth. . . . Let us say it at once: they formed an integral part of the<br />
human body, and for that reason they were fit to serve as measures for the huts, the houses and the temples<br />
that had to be built. More than that: they were in<strong>de</strong>finitely rich and subtle because they formed part of the<br />
mathematics of the human body, gracious, elegant and firm, the source of that harmony which moves us: beauty.<br />
(Le Corbusier, 18-19).<br />
27<br />
43<br />
Just as Corbusier highly regar<strong>de</strong>d the primitive<br />
form, so he highly regards the body. And<br />
why should he not when he believes in the<br />
simplicity of forms? These tools, these ways<br />
of measuring, they are infinitely more impressive<br />
when we consi<strong>de</strong>r that they are the original<br />
tools. The beauty that Corbusier sees in<br />
these tools is that they are a part of a greater<br />
whole that is, by nature, of divine proportion.<br />
I will not go into <strong>de</strong>tail about how the Modulor<br />
was <strong>de</strong>rived (I would never do it justice<br />
consi<strong>de</strong>ring there are two books <strong>de</strong>voted to<br />
70<br />
86<br />
113<br />
140<br />
226<br />
183<br />
86<br />
Modulor to the Test<br />
226<br />
183<br />
cell dimensions
technique<br />
The Panel Exercise<br />
Architectural technique is a vast and varied<br />
process that can be attributed to any piece<br />
of work worth noting. Architects employ a<br />
series of tools -- of techniques -- that work for<br />
them and that are drivers of form, concept,<br />
circu<strong>la</strong>tion, etc. Le Corbusier typically used<br />
The Modulor as a technique, but I wanted to<br />
explore a few other i<strong>de</strong>as since I’ve already<br />
touched on The Modulor in previous portions<br />
of this <strong>study</strong>. I would like to explore a diagram<br />
that <strong>de</strong>als with materiality of La Tourette in<br />
it) just that the system combines these ratios<br />
and mathematics and produces an infinite<br />
number of combinations. In his book,<br />
The Modulor, Corbusier <strong>de</strong>scribes an exercise<br />
in which “you take a square, say, and divert<br />
yourself by dividing it up in accordance with<br />
the measures of the ‘Modulor’. The game can<br />
be p<strong>la</strong>yed in<strong>de</strong>finitely. Another version of the<br />
exercise is to try to <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong> which of the combinations<br />
are the most satisfactory or the most<br />
beautiful” (Le Corbusier, 92). The keywords<br />
by Corbusier here are “which of the combinations<br />
are the most satisfactory or the most<br />
beautiful.” We already know that Corbusier<br />
believes primary forms to beautiful, as well<br />
as the rudimentary tools that are our bodies;<br />
logically we can only conclu<strong>de</strong> that any form,<br />
iteration, pattern, or otherwise <strong>de</strong>rived from<br />
the Modulor is beautiful; it is not a question<br />
of an ugly iteration of the body, that does not<br />
exist out of the Modulor, it is a question of<br />
which iteration we find most beautiful.<br />
re<strong>la</strong>tion to the monastic lifestyle. I’ll be looking<br />
at concrete and how it performs functionally<br />
for aesthetics and <strong>de</strong>sign. Following that<br />
I want to touch on the i<strong>de</strong>a of typology and<br />
prece<strong>de</strong>nt where I can use other monasteries<br />
for inspiration and how they are alike and<br />
different to La Tourette. Lastly I would like to<br />
en<strong>de</strong>avor on the i<strong>de</strong>a of “program.” I want<br />
to look at how a client’s initial i<strong>de</strong>a of what<br />
they want can be integrated into the process<br />
of technique.
view<br />
light<br />
thickness<br />
folding<br />
This diagram is a brief exploration in concrete<br />
in re<strong>la</strong>tion to the monastery and the monks<br />
choosing to live with few to no material possessions;<br />
the almost bare nature of the concrete<br />
achieves this notion. I wanted to look<br />
at how puncturing concrete affects a space in<br />
terms of light and view; wall and roof thick-<br />
materiality<br />
ness; and folding. From this exploration I find<br />
that I’m noticing more subtle <strong>de</strong>tails through<br />
La Tourette. I am questioning why each light<br />
puncture is positioned as is and how the<br />
thickness of roofs and walls can affect those<br />
punctures as well as their position.
Here I have looked at the monastery as a<br />
‘type.’ I took a handful of monasteries from<br />
around the world and created simple parti diagrams<br />
from each. Simi<strong>la</strong>rly with La Tourette.<br />
Then I looked at morphing all of the chapels<br />
into one mess. The results have shown me<br />
that regardless of where and when each<br />
monastery was built, the cloister remains a<br />
prominent shape in the partis. While Corbusier<br />
chose to explore a more direct circu<strong>la</strong>tion<br />
he still left hints of the quadrangle and the<br />
i<strong>de</strong>a that the monastery is literally “insi<strong>de</strong> the<br />
box” away from the world.<br />
typology
“To house one hundred hearts and one hundred<br />
minds in silence.” This quote embodies<br />
the entirety of La Tourette. The diagram<br />
reflects a triptych; The Father, The Son, and<br />
The Holy Ghost. The Father is representing<br />
the heart. The Son, God’s worldly form , is<br />
the body. Lastly, in silence means to be of<br />
program<br />
oneself, of their own soul, The Holy Ghost.<br />
The red dot signifies the <strong>la</strong>ck of sound in the<br />
monastery and is tied into the fact that other<br />
well known monasteries, and many others,<br />
find themselves seclu<strong>de</strong>d, allowing both the<br />
monks and the building to resi<strong>de</strong> in silence.
space<br />
In architecture we often think of space as this<br />
all encompassing entity; p<strong>la</strong>ces that both are<br />
enclosed and open. Henri Lefebvre, in his<br />
writing, The Production of Space, suggests<br />
that the spaces we create in architecture carry<br />
messages, that “space in<strong>de</strong>ed ‘speaks’ —<br />
but it does not tell all” (Lefebvre, 183). Furthermore<br />
Lefebvre elicits that space <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>s<br />
what may or may not happen within it. This<br />
i<strong>de</strong>a is ma<strong>de</strong> apparent in La Tourette when<br />
we consi<strong>de</strong>r formal and social logics, material<br />
implications, and sensations and ritual. What<br />
I would like to suggest is that La Tourette em-<br />
bodies a space that speaks to i<strong>de</strong>as of minimalism<br />
and ritual. Some of this <strong>la</strong>nguage<br />
may be b<strong>la</strong>tantly readable and other portions<br />
perhaps slightly more ambiguous.<br />
As a whole, the monastery is governed<br />
through the formal and cultural logics of program.<br />
In the diagram below we see two sets<br />
of p<strong>la</strong>ns. The p<strong>la</strong>ns on the left illustrate a<br />
formal governance. Each programmatic typology<br />
is <strong>de</strong>lineated through color; purple<br />
as prayer, red as dining, blue as education,<br />
green as living, and yellow as visitor holding.<br />
The message of these spaces suggest singu<strong>la</strong>r<br />
formal program cultural program
functionality, this is p<strong>la</strong>usible being that the<br />
monks of La Tourette lead a very structured<br />
and strict lifestyle. On the right, the p<strong>la</strong>ns are<br />
divi<strong>de</strong>d out by public space (green) and private<br />
space (red). This is the cultural logic of<br />
La Tourette. Because the monks live mostly<br />
in solitu<strong>de</strong>, public and private exist as a cultural<br />
boundary between the insi<strong>de</strong>rs and the<br />
outsi<strong>de</strong>rs.<br />
When we look at the church of La Tourette<br />
more closely we can see a new spatial ordinance<br />
beyond program; patterns in sensation<br />
and emotion. People often feel a wi<strong>de</strong> range<br />
of sensations in a church (guilt, humility, exaltation,<br />
joy, re<strong>de</strong>mption, relief, love, grief,<br />
helplessness, reverence, etc). The intensity<br />
of these sensations and emotions vary from<br />
person to person but repetition of these emotions<br />
and sensations are achieved through<br />
ritual. The rituals of prayer, mass, funerals,<br />
weddings, and so on. The <strong>la</strong>nguage of this<br />
space becomes more mysterious. I am not<br />
looking to <strong>de</strong>lve into Christian mythology and<br />
whether or not prayer and miracles are legitimate,<br />
what I am seeking to convey is that<br />
sensational space
the people who do believe in these aspects<br />
of religion find spaces such as La Tourette as<br />
representing a <strong>la</strong>nguage as wi<strong>de</strong> as the sensations<br />
felt within it.<br />
Finally I would like to discuss the material<br />
implications ma<strong>de</strong> through space. As we<br />
have already discussed, the Monks at La Tourette<br />
live a minimalist lifestyle, no ornament<br />
or ad<strong>de</strong>d frills. Furthermore, Le Corbusier<br />
had to consi<strong>de</strong>r the fact that the budget for<br />
the monastery was re<strong>la</strong>tively low. On closer<br />
inspection of the spaces of the monastery<br />
I started to realize there was a trend in the<br />
colors that Corbusier used. The material diagram<br />
below shows the colors, materials, and<br />
“ornaments” found throughout the monastery.<br />
Some mistake the stark nature of the<br />
spaces as being <strong>de</strong>pressing when, in fact, Le<br />
Corbusier intentionally <strong>de</strong>signed them in this<br />
manner. The spaces speak to a reality that<br />
what we truly need in life is far less than what<br />
we actually practice.<br />
COLOR<br />
red: the color of blood and fire;<br />
represents the commemoration<br />
of martyred saints and pentacost<br />
yellow: the color of light; represents<br />
divinity<br />
green: the color of p<strong>la</strong>nt life:<br />
represents triumph of life over<br />
<strong>de</strong>ath<br />
white: represents purity, innocence,<br />
and holiness<br />
b<strong>la</strong>ck: represent <strong>de</strong>ath<br />
MATERIAL<br />
cloth: minimal and p<strong>la</strong>in<br />
concrete: inexpensive and p<strong>la</strong>in<br />
wood: no trim or stain<br />
SYMBOLS<br />
crucifix: only ornament in all of<br />
La Tourette<br />
material implications
sources<br />
A. Henze and B. Moosbrugger, Le Corbusier: La Tourette, Josef Keller Ver<strong>la</strong>g, 1966.<br />
Beatriz Colomina, ``The Medical Body in Mo<strong>de</strong>rn Architecture,`` in Anybody, MIT Press, 1997, pp. 284-89.<br />
Charles Jencks, Le Corbusier and the Tragic View of Architecture, Allen Lane, 1973, pp.<br />
Deborah Gans, The Le Corbusier Gui<strong>de</strong>: Third Edition, Princeton Architectural Press, 2006, pp. 100-105.<br />
Henri Lefebvre, “The Production of Space,” in K.M. Hays, ed., Architecture Theory since 1968, pp. 178-188.<br />
J. Ruskin, “The Nature of Gothic,” in Stones of Venice (1853), Penguin, 2001, pp. 91-105.<br />
Jose Baltanas, Walking Through Le Corbusier: A Tour of His Masterworks, Thames and Hudson, 2005, pp. 134-<br />
165.<br />
K. Frampton and R. Schezen, Le Corbusier: Architect of the Twentieth Century, Harry N. Abrams, Inc., 2002, pp.<br />
177-181.<br />
Le Corbusier, The Modulor, Faber and Faber, 1948.<br />
Le Corbusier, Modulor 2, The M.I.T. Press, 1958.<br />
Le Corbusier, Towards a New Architecture, BN Publishing, 2008.<br />
Paul Rudolph, “The Six Determinants of Architectural Form,” in C. Jencks and K. Kropf, eds., Theories and Manifestoes<br />
of Contemporary Architecture, Wiley-Aca<strong>de</strong>my, 2006, pp. 213-215.<br />
Richard Weston, Key Buildings of the Twentieth Century: P<strong>la</strong>ns, Sections and Elevations, W.W. Norton & Company,<br />
Inc., 2004, pp. 114-115.<br />
Yukio Fuagawa and Arata Isozaki, Global Architecture: Le Corbusier Couvent Sainte-Marie <strong>de</strong> La Tourette,<br />
A.D.A. Edita, 1971.