07.04.2013 Views

case study: couvent sainte-marie de la tourette

case study: couvent sainte-marie de la tourette

case study: couvent sainte-marie de la tourette

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>case</strong> <strong>study</strong>: <strong>couvent</strong> <strong>sainte</strong>-<strong>marie</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> <strong>tourette</strong><br />

DAVID JENISTA<br />

LE CORBUSIER and IANNIS XENAKIS 1953-1960


“To house one hundred hearts and<br />

one hundred bodies in silence”<br />

form<br />

The above were the words of Dominican<br />

Father Marie-A<strong>la</strong>in Couturier; his commission's<br />

essence offered to friend and architect<br />

Le Corbusier for a monastery to house one<br />

hundred Dominican monks. Couvent Sainte-<br />

Marie <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> Tourette (henceforth La Tourette)<br />

was consi<strong>de</strong>red to be of a genius nature and<br />

in or<strong>de</strong>r to un<strong>de</strong>rstand the form, or rather<br />

forms, we must examine Le Corbusier's i<strong>de</strong>as<br />

on architecture as well as the culture and social<br />

customs of the Dominican lifestyle. We<br />

will also see that the genius of the form meets<br />

the theoretical standards of other architects.<br />

As Le Corbusier states in terms of mass: Architecture<br />

is the masterly, correct and magnificent p<strong>la</strong>y<br />

of masses brought together in light. Our eyes are<br />

ma<strong>de</strong> to see forms in light; light and sha<strong>de</strong> reveal<br />

these forms; cubes, cones, spheres, cylin<strong>de</strong>rs or<br />

pyramids are the great primary forms which light<br />

reveals to advantage; the image of these is distinct<br />

and tangible within us and without ambiguity.<br />

It is for that reason that these are beautiful<br />

forms, the most beautiful forms. (Le Corbusier, 29)


gol<strong>de</strong>n section diagram<br />

It is suggested that impure forms would <strong>de</strong>tract<br />

from the beauty of a building while also<br />

<strong>de</strong>terring us from maximally experiencing<br />

the spaces within it. Le Corbusier's "geometric<br />

rule of the building encompasses the<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rlying forms of prismatic solids, [and]<br />

the application of Modulor measurements<br />

[is attributed] to many aspects of the interior"<br />

(Gans, 101). The Modulor was a system<br />

of proportion, of Le Corbusier's <strong>de</strong>sign,<br />

based on human measurements, the double<br />

unit, the Fibonacci numbers, and the gol<strong>de</strong>n<br />

ratio. It was the Modulor merged with the<br />

musical compositions of Corbusier's project<br />

manager, Iannis Xenakis, that dictated the<br />

<strong>la</strong>nguage of the pans <strong>de</strong> verre ondu<strong>la</strong>toires,<br />

the pinwheel fenestrations, and other proportions<br />

of the monastery. It is the success<br />

of the pure forms in conjunction with Le Corbusier's<br />

expert experimentation with light<br />

and proportion that allow the monks to experience<br />

La Tourette for its function in a lucid<br />

manner rather than through the distraction<br />

of what could be termed 'impure forms.'<br />

On a much smaller scale of form, because<br />

La Tourette was partially cast in p<strong>la</strong>ce, it becomes<br />

necessary to <strong>de</strong>pict how some acci<strong>de</strong>ntal<br />

forms came to be. While Le Corbusier was<br />

certainly not a fanatic of the Gothic style he<br />

did recognize that "entrusting the physical expression<br />

of his <strong>de</strong>sign to those building it was<br />

at once a logical acceptance of circumstance<br />

and a romantic act based on a neo-Gothic trust<br />

in the re<strong>la</strong>tion of the workman to the work"<br />

(Gans, 102). This notion is more evi<strong>de</strong>nt when


we consi<strong>de</strong>r Ruskin's i<strong>de</strong>a that forms were not limited by a master p<strong>la</strong>n and that the form<br />

as <strong>de</strong>rived at the hands of man; "utterly regardless of any established conventionalities<br />

of external appearance, knowing [...] that such daring interruptions of the formal p<strong>la</strong>n<br />

would rather give additional interest to its symmetry than injure it" (Ruskin, 168-169).<br />

Le Corbusier, through his dialectic of dualities, sought to celebrate the variances and<br />

mistakes of human error that inevitably contributed to the genius of the final product.<br />

possible window configurations based on musical scores<br />

GLYCERINE bush (gavin rossdale)<br />

J’AVAIS UN AMOUR AUTREFOIS iannis xenakis<br />

RIVER FLOWS IN YOU yiruma<br />

THE VOICE WITHIN christina aguilera & glen bal<strong>la</strong>rd<br />

In terms of the monastic lifestyle we can see that the traditional spaces of the cloister<br />

exist as the monks expressed their needs but, "the form and space distribution was<br />

left up to Le Corbusier" (Henze, 8). Le Corbusier had visited several abbeys, both in<br />

his past and in preparation for the project at hand, that left him an incredible un<strong>de</strong>rstanding<br />

and appreciation for the monastic lifestyle. He felt the monks exhibited an<br />

"'indissoluble binomial of the individual-collective'" (Gans, 103). Le Corbusier sought<br />

to embody t and materially minimalist lifestyle of the monks through a series of dualities,<br />

his own personal dialectic: Individual-collective; light-dark; secu<strong>la</strong>r-religious;<br />

lucid-obscure; temporal-permanent; incremental-continuous; rational-irrational; architecture-nature;<br />

high-low. These dualities combined with Le Corbusier's incredible<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the monks' daily life generated a series of forms in an almost harsh<br />

contrast to one another that expressed his notion of pure and beautiful geometries.


individual :: collective<br />

incremental :: continuous<br />

secu<strong>la</strong>r :: religious<br />

formative binomial dialectic<br />

dark :: light<br />

high :: low<br />

lucid :: obscure<br />

nature :: architecture<br />

irrational :: rational<br />

individual :: collective


I wish to venture to compare the genius of<br />

La Tourette to the theoretical standards of<br />

Paul Rudolph and his six <strong>de</strong>terminants of<br />

architectural form. The following examination<br />

seeks to pull minimal examples from<br />

La Tourette and should offer a glimpse<br />

into the specific forms of the structure.<br />

First Determinant: Building's Environment<br />

In re<strong>la</strong>tion to the site, Le Corbusier<br />

sought to separate the building from the hillsi<strong>de</strong><br />

in an effort to dominate the surrounding<br />

nature to reinforce his dialectic of dualities<br />

which reiterates Rudolph's thought that<br />

"religious buildings [...] should serve as focal<br />

points in our cities" (Rudolph, 213).<br />

Second Determinant: Function<br />

By reducing La Tourette to a mere<br />

function with no excesses and the maximization<br />

of circu<strong>la</strong>tion, the form that took shape<br />

reflected both traditional monastic values<br />

and Le Corbusier's personal i<strong>de</strong>as and theories.<br />

Interestingly enough, La Tourette exceedingly<br />

satisfies Rudolph's i<strong>de</strong>a that the<br />

building should be regar<strong>de</strong>d as whole in how<br />

it works.<br />

Third Determinant: Particu<strong>la</strong>r Site Conditions<br />

Simply enough the building responds<br />

to sun patterns, access to the site, and location<br />

and positioning in re<strong>la</strong>tion to the surrounding<br />

forest and valleys. The summer<br />

solstice generated the forms of the sacristy<br />

light cannons.<br />

Fourth Determinant: Materials<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to ren<strong>de</strong>r the abbey affordable<br />

while reflecting the simple and non-<br />

materialistic nature of the monks, Le Corbusier<br />

resolved to use both precast and cast in p<strong>la</strong>ce<br />

concrete. The monolithic nature of the form is<br />

reinforced by the materiality in that it expresses<br />

the building's eloquence and true nature, as<br />

Rudolph suggests it should.<br />

Fifth Determinant: Psychology<br />

Rudolph believes that this <strong>de</strong>terminant<br />

is achieved "through the manipu<strong>la</strong>tion of space<br />

and the use of symbols" (Rudolph, 214). The<br />

oratory column and the main ambu<strong>la</strong>tory are<br />

cruciform in nature and thus symbolize the religious<br />

nature of La Tourette.<br />

Sixth Determinant: Spirit of the Time<br />

Here is where I believe La Tourette does<br />

not measure up with Rudolph's values. Not in<br />

the sense that Le Corbusier was wrong in his<br />

<strong>de</strong>sign, but because he was correct. It could<br />

be argued that Le Corbusier was not concerned<br />

with the spirit of the times. He merely wished<br />

to convey a building through a binomial <strong>la</strong>nguage<br />

that reflected the values and needs of<br />

the Dominicans. The form of La Tourette is not<br />

troubled with the i<strong>de</strong>as of an outsi<strong>de</strong> society<br />

and so I dare to suggest that it ren<strong>de</strong>rs Rudolph's<br />

sixth <strong>de</strong>terminant irrelevant.<br />

body<br />

Now that we have discussed La Tourette in<br />

terms of form we must consi<strong>de</strong>r the body;<br />

the building as a p<strong>la</strong>ce to house one hundred<br />

healthy bodies and a strcuture that is ‘ma<strong>de</strong>’ up<br />

of one hundred (or more) bodies. In “The Medical<br />

Body in Mo<strong>de</strong>rn Archtiecture,” by Beatriz<br />

Colomina, we find that Le Corbusier believes<br />

the “house is first and foremost a machine for


personal barrier<br />

sun<br />

view<br />

venti<strong>la</strong>tion<br />

the healthy body and the cell<br />

he believed disease was bred. Furthermore,<br />

he reiterated a healthy body by incorporating<br />

the roof gar<strong>de</strong>n where the monks could get<br />

exercise. Le Corbusier so strongly believed in<br />

a healthy body in architecture that even the<br />

monks’ cells in La Tourette mimic this notion.<br />

The cells are completely private (unless one<br />

were to invite another in), including the balconies.<br />

They offer cross venti<strong>la</strong>tion from the<br />

balconies into the halls through operable louvers.<br />

Every room looks out into nature and<br />

so each room receives sun light, air, and a<br />

view. I touched on this in terms of form, but<br />

Corbusier <strong>de</strong>signed the monastery around a<br />

series of daulities. The dua<strong>la</strong>ity of individual<br />

versus collective offers an extensive set of<br />

options in La Tourette where bodies become<br />

more <strong>de</strong>nsified or released throughout. If we<br />

extend Corbusier’s obsession to a healthy<br />

mind, we have only to offer one of many examples.<br />

People who have visited La Tourette<br />

have said that the building is anything but<br />

dreary and so we may suggest that the building<br />

bolsters the healthy body and mind. But<br />

now let us look at the Modulor.<br />

health, a form of therapy” (Colomina, 232).<br />

Clearly we are not un<strong>de</strong>r the impression<br />

that La Tourette is a house, but Corbusier’s<br />

five points of architecture, and his apparent<br />

obsession with health, as <strong>de</strong>scribed by<br />

Colomina, offer insight into La Tourette as<br />

a healthy ‘home’ for one hundred monks.<br />

“Le Corbusier has long been obsessed with<br />

health,” (Colomina, 232) and so La Tourette<br />

was raised from the ground in an effort to remove<br />

the inhabitants from the ground where<br />

concentration of bodies in space


At one point Colomina offers that Le Corbusier and his colleagues removed the body as a symbol<br />

and something that occupies architecture and rep<strong>la</strong>ced it as a body that informs architecture.<br />

This is Le Corbusier’s Modulor and it can only be <strong>de</strong>scribed as a genius proportioning system,<br />

and as previously discussed it was based on human measurements, the double unit, the Fibonacci<br />

numbers, and the gol<strong>de</strong>n ratio.<br />

Primitive men at all times and in all p<strong>la</strong>ces, as also the bearers of high civilization, Egyptian, Chal<strong>de</strong>an, Greek, all<br />

these have built and, by that token, measured. What were the tools they used? They were eternal and enduring,<br />

precious because they were linked to the human person. The names of these tools were: elbow (cubit),<br />

finger (digit), thumb (inch), foot, pace, and so forth. . . . Let us say it at once: they formed an integral part of the<br />

human body, and for that reason they were fit to serve as measures for the huts, the houses and the temples<br />

that had to be built. More than that: they were in<strong>de</strong>finitely rich and subtle because they formed part of the<br />

mathematics of the human body, gracious, elegant and firm, the source of that harmony which moves us: beauty.<br />

(Le Corbusier, 18-19).<br />

27<br />

43<br />

Just as Corbusier highly regar<strong>de</strong>d the primitive<br />

form, so he highly regards the body. And<br />

why should he not when he believes in the<br />

simplicity of forms? These tools, these ways<br />

of measuring, they are infinitely more impressive<br />

when we consi<strong>de</strong>r that they are the original<br />

tools. The beauty that Corbusier sees in<br />

these tools is that they are a part of a greater<br />

whole that is, by nature, of divine proportion.<br />

I will not go into <strong>de</strong>tail about how the Modulor<br />

was <strong>de</strong>rived (I would never do it justice<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>ring there are two books <strong>de</strong>voted to<br />

70<br />

86<br />

113<br />

140<br />

226<br />

183<br />

86<br />

Modulor to the Test<br />

226<br />

183<br />

cell dimensions


technique<br />

The Panel Exercise<br />

Architectural technique is a vast and varied<br />

process that can be attributed to any piece<br />

of work worth noting. Architects employ a<br />

series of tools -- of techniques -- that work for<br />

them and that are drivers of form, concept,<br />

circu<strong>la</strong>tion, etc. Le Corbusier typically used<br />

The Modulor as a technique, but I wanted to<br />

explore a few other i<strong>de</strong>as since I’ve already<br />

touched on The Modulor in previous portions<br />

of this <strong>study</strong>. I would like to explore a diagram<br />

that <strong>de</strong>als with materiality of La Tourette in<br />

it) just that the system combines these ratios<br />

and mathematics and produces an infinite<br />

number of combinations. In his book,<br />

The Modulor, Corbusier <strong>de</strong>scribes an exercise<br />

in which “you take a square, say, and divert<br />

yourself by dividing it up in accordance with<br />

the measures of the ‘Modulor’. The game can<br />

be p<strong>la</strong>yed in<strong>de</strong>finitely. Another version of the<br />

exercise is to try to <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong> which of the combinations<br />

are the most satisfactory or the most<br />

beautiful” (Le Corbusier, 92). The keywords<br />

by Corbusier here are “which of the combinations<br />

are the most satisfactory or the most<br />

beautiful.” We already know that Corbusier<br />

believes primary forms to beautiful, as well<br />

as the rudimentary tools that are our bodies;<br />

logically we can only conclu<strong>de</strong> that any form,<br />

iteration, pattern, or otherwise <strong>de</strong>rived from<br />

the Modulor is beautiful; it is not a question<br />

of an ugly iteration of the body, that does not<br />

exist out of the Modulor, it is a question of<br />

which iteration we find most beautiful.<br />

re<strong>la</strong>tion to the monastic lifestyle. I’ll be looking<br />

at concrete and how it performs functionally<br />

for aesthetics and <strong>de</strong>sign. Following that<br />

I want to touch on the i<strong>de</strong>a of typology and<br />

prece<strong>de</strong>nt where I can use other monasteries<br />

for inspiration and how they are alike and<br />

different to La Tourette. Lastly I would like to<br />

en<strong>de</strong>avor on the i<strong>de</strong>a of “program.” I want<br />

to look at how a client’s initial i<strong>de</strong>a of what<br />

they want can be integrated into the process<br />

of technique.


view<br />

light<br />

thickness<br />

folding<br />

This diagram is a brief exploration in concrete<br />

in re<strong>la</strong>tion to the monastery and the monks<br />

choosing to live with few to no material possessions;<br />

the almost bare nature of the concrete<br />

achieves this notion. I wanted to look<br />

at how puncturing concrete affects a space in<br />

terms of light and view; wall and roof thick-<br />

materiality<br />

ness; and folding. From this exploration I find<br />

that I’m noticing more subtle <strong>de</strong>tails through<br />

La Tourette. I am questioning why each light<br />

puncture is positioned as is and how the<br />

thickness of roofs and walls can affect those<br />

punctures as well as their position.


Here I have looked at the monastery as a<br />

‘type.’ I took a handful of monasteries from<br />

around the world and created simple parti diagrams<br />

from each. Simi<strong>la</strong>rly with La Tourette.<br />

Then I looked at morphing all of the chapels<br />

into one mess. The results have shown me<br />

that regardless of where and when each<br />

monastery was built, the cloister remains a<br />

prominent shape in the partis. While Corbusier<br />

chose to explore a more direct circu<strong>la</strong>tion<br />

he still left hints of the quadrangle and the<br />

i<strong>de</strong>a that the monastery is literally “insi<strong>de</strong> the<br />

box” away from the world.<br />

typology


“To house one hundred hearts and one hundred<br />

minds in silence.” This quote embodies<br />

the entirety of La Tourette. The diagram<br />

reflects a triptych; The Father, The Son, and<br />

The Holy Ghost. The Father is representing<br />

the heart. The Son, God’s worldly form , is<br />

the body. Lastly, in silence means to be of<br />

program<br />

oneself, of their own soul, The Holy Ghost.<br />

The red dot signifies the <strong>la</strong>ck of sound in the<br />

monastery and is tied into the fact that other<br />

well known monasteries, and many others,<br />

find themselves seclu<strong>de</strong>d, allowing both the<br />

monks and the building to resi<strong>de</strong> in silence.


space<br />

In architecture we often think of space as this<br />

all encompassing entity; p<strong>la</strong>ces that both are<br />

enclosed and open. Henri Lefebvre, in his<br />

writing, The Production of Space, suggests<br />

that the spaces we create in architecture carry<br />

messages, that “space in<strong>de</strong>ed ‘speaks’ —<br />

but it does not tell all” (Lefebvre, 183). Furthermore<br />

Lefebvre elicits that space <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>s<br />

what may or may not happen within it. This<br />

i<strong>de</strong>a is ma<strong>de</strong> apparent in La Tourette when<br />

we consi<strong>de</strong>r formal and social logics, material<br />

implications, and sensations and ritual. What<br />

I would like to suggest is that La Tourette em-<br />

bodies a space that speaks to i<strong>de</strong>as of minimalism<br />

and ritual. Some of this <strong>la</strong>nguage<br />

may be b<strong>la</strong>tantly readable and other portions<br />

perhaps slightly more ambiguous.<br />

As a whole, the monastery is governed<br />

through the formal and cultural logics of program.<br />

In the diagram below we see two sets<br />

of p<strong>la</strong>ns. The p<strong>la</strong>ns on the left illustrate a<br />

formal governance. Each programmatic typology<br />

is <strong>de</strong>lineated through color; purple<br />

as prayer, red as dining, blue as education,<br />

green as living, and yellow as visitor holding.<br />

The message of these spaces suggest singu<strong>la</strong>r<br />

formal program cultural program


functionality, this is p<strong>la</strong>usible being that the<br />

monks of La Tourette lead a very structured<br />

and strict lifestyle. On the right, the p<strong>la</strong>ns are<br />

divi<strong>de</strong>d out by public space (green) and private<br />

space (red). This is the cultural logic of<br />

La Tourette. Because the monks live mostly<br />

in solitu<strong>de</strong>, public and private exist as a cultural<br />

boundary between the insi<strong>de</strong>rs and the<br />

outsi<strong>de</strong>rs.<br />

When we look at the church of La Tourette<br />

more closely we can see a new spatial ordinance<br />

beyond program; patterns in sensation<br />

and emotion. People often feel a wi<strong>de</strong> range<br />

of sensations in a church (guilt, humility, exaltation,<br />

joy, re<strong>de</strong>mption, relief, love, grief,<br />

helplessness, reverence, etc). The intensity<br />

of these sensations and emotions vary from<br />

person to person but repetition of these emotions<br />

and sensations are achieved through<br />

ritual. The rituals of prayer, mass, funerals,<br />

weddings, and so on. The <strong>la</strong>nguage of this<br />

space becomes more mysterious. I am not<br />

looking to <strong>de</strong>lve into Christian mythology and<br />

whether or not prayer and miracles are legitimate,<br />

what I am seeking to convey is that<br />

sensational space


the people who do believe in these aspects<br />

of religion find spaces such as La Tourette as<br />

representing a <strong>la</strong>nguage as wi<strong>de</strong> as the sensations<br />

felt within it.<br />

Finally I would like to discuss the material<br />

implications ma<strong>de</strong> through space. As we<br />

have already discussed, the Monks at La Tourette<br />

live a minimalist lifestyle, no ornament<br />

or ad<strong>de</strong>d frills. Furthermore, Le Corbusier<br />

had to consi<strong>de</strong>r the fact that the budget for<br />

the monastery was re<strong>la</strong>tively low. On closer<br />

inspection of the spaces of the monastery<br />

I started to realize there was a trend in the<br />

colors that Corbusier used. The material diagram<br />

below shows the colors, materials, and<br />

“ornaments” found throughout the monastery.<br />

Some mistake the stark nature of the<br />

spaces as being <strong>de</strong>pressing when, in fact, Le<br />

Corbusier intentionally <strong>de</strong>signed them in this<br />

manner. The spaces speak to a reality that<br />

what we truly need in life is far less than what<br />

we actually practice.<br />

COLOR<br />

red: the color of blood and fire;<br />

represents the commemoration<br />

of martyred saints and pentacost<br />

yellow: the color of light; represents<br />

divinity<br />

green: the color of p<strong>la</strong>nt life:<br />

represents triumph of life over<br />

<strong>de</strong>ath<br />

white: represents purity, innocence,<br />

and holiness<br />

b<strong>la</strong>ck: represent <strong>de</strong>ath<br />

MATERIAL<br />

cloth: minimal and p<strong>la</strong>in<br />

concrete: inexpensive and p<strong>la</strong>in<br />

wood: no trim or stain<br />

SYMBOLS<br />

crucifix: only ornament in all of<br />

La Tourette<br />

material implications


sources<br />

A. Henze and B. Moosbrugger, Le Corbusier: La Tourette, Josef Keller Ver<strong>la</strong>g, 1966.<br />

Beatriz Colomina, ``The Medical Body in Mo<strong>de</strong>rn Architecture,`` in Anybody, MIT Press, 1997, pp. 284-89.<br />

Charles Jencks, Le Corbusier and the Tragic View of Architecture, Allen Lane, 1973, pp.<br />

Deborah Gans, The Le Corbusier Gui<strong>de</strong>: Third Edition, Princeton Architectural Press, 2006, pp. 100-105.<br />

Henri Lefebvre, “The Production of Space,” in K.M. Hays, ed., Architecture Theory since 1968, pp. 178-188.<br />

J. Ruskin, “The Nature of Gothic,” in Stones of Venice (1853), Penguin, 2001, pp. 91-105.<br />

Jose Baltanas, Walking Through Le Corbusier: A Tour of His Masterworks, Thames and Hudson, 2005, pp. 134-<br />

165.<br />

K. Frampton and R. Schezen, Le Corbusier: Architect of the Twentieth Century, Harry N. Abrams, Inc., 2002, pp.<br />

177-181.<br />

Le Corbusier, The Modulor, Faber and Faber, 1948.<br />

Le Corbusier, Modulor 2, The M.I.T. Press, 1958.<br />

Le Corbusier, Towards a New Architecture, BN Publishing, 2008.<br />

Paul Rudolph, “The Six Determinants of Architectural Form,” in C. Jencks and K. Kropf, eds., Theories and Manifestoes<br />

of Contemporary Architecture, Wiley-Aca<strong>de</strong>my, 2006, pp. 213-215.<br />

Richard Weston, Key Buildings of the Twentieth Century: P<strong>la</strong>ns, Sections and Elevations, W.W. Norton & Company,<br />

Inc., 2004, pp. 114-115.<br />

Yukio Fuagawa and Arata Isozaki, Global Architecture: Le Corbusier Couvent Sainte-Marie <strong>de</strong> La Tourette,<br />

A.D.A. Edita, 1971.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!