My new (to me) Parker 61 Flighter fountain pen.

Lately I have got a bit hooked on buying vintage Parker fountain pens on eBay. I have been fortunate in finding some classic pens with gold nibs and plenty of life left in them, at attractive prices.

The latest to arrive was a Parker 61 Flighter. This was an impulse buy after receiving one of eBay’s thoughtful emails, that an auction of a pen I had viewed, was soon to end and inviting me to make my bid. By the time I read the email, the auction had barely 60 seconds left to go. I made a quick decision to bid and watched nervously as the final seconds ticked down. I did not have long to wait. The outcome was that three people had bid in the final minute. By a stroke of luck, my bid of £31.36 had won, by just 85p.

Parker 61 Flighter.

The pen arrived this morning. Although I have enjoyed Parker pens since the 1970’s, I had not owned a Parker 61 before. I recall being very enamoured with Parker’s Flighter pens, as a ten year old boy.

First impressions were good. The brushed stainless steel finish feels smooth and luxurious. The slip cap pulls off silently and easily yet feels secure enough when on. The pen is more sleek and tapered than my Parker 51, and slightly shorter overall, yet the grip section is about 1cm longer. The Parker 61 has a distinctive inlaid arrow on the section, introduced to help people know which way the tiny nib was facing, although these are known to fall off.

The Parker 61 was first introduced in the USA in 1956 but not in England until the early 1960’s. The early models featured an innovative new capillary filling system. This was part of the quest for a convenient method of refilling a fountain pen without the mess. This new system consisted of a cylinder coated in Teflon, a non-stick finish. To fill the pen, the user had simply to unscrew the barrel, place the pen, nib up, in a bottle of ink, and wait about 30 seconds for the cylinder to fill itself by capillary action. Then the pen could be lifted from the bottle and, in theory at least, ink would not adhere to the Teflon coating. The barrel could be screwed back on without a need to clean the cylinder.

In practice the Teflon would flake off eventually and some cleaning was necessary. It seems that the system was not as popular as hoped. Also, there was a tendency for the cylinder to get clogged up, if the pen was not cleaned out from time to time. Before long the system was dropped and instead, later versions used Parker’s new cartridges or else a detachable aerometric-style cartridge-converter.

My model has the cartridge-converter. I do not know the date of it. It was made in England, which puts it before the closure of the Parker Pen factory in Newhaven in around 2011. But I read on Tony Fischier’s site, parkerpens.net that the Parker 61 range was discontinued in 1983 and so my pen is at least 40 years old. It does not have the “Quality Pen” date code on the cap, introduced in 1980 and so I can narrow the date down to 1960’s or 1970’s. I suspect that there are other clues to discover.

The squeeze bar, cartridge-converter version.

On its arrival, my pen still had traces of blue ink and I gave it an initial flush in water, using the converter. On squeezing the converter, a healthy stream of air bubbles was emitted from the nib, an encouraging sign.

Then as I removed the converter to wash out the section, I noticed that the connector was loose and rotating. I carefully unscrewed this, whereupon I could take out the nib, feed and ink collector, separate them and give them a clean.

Connector, ink collector, feed, nib and shell, after their bath.

I was careful not to lose any small parts. In my excitement, and after cleaning and photographing the pieces, I forgot the sequence for reassembly and watched an informative YouTube video from Grandmia Pens, which set me right. Steff advises against unscrewing the shell in the Parker 61s, as they are prone to cracking and shrinkage. It is not advisable to apply heat to them to soften the adhesive, (as you might with a Parker 51) for this reason.

Although the pen in his video was the capillary filler version, the principles are largely the same, as follows:

  • first find the channel in the the ink collector. This should be aligned with the nib;
  • insert the nib carefully into the collector, pushing it in as far as it will go.
  • slide the black plastic feed into the ink collector from the back, all the way into the nib, which leaves a small part of the nib protruding beyond the feed;
  • insert the nib, feed and ink collector into the shell, or section; notches will align them correctly;
  • preferably, apply a little silicone grease to the threads, before screwing the connector inside the shell with the end of the feed passing through the hole in the connector;
  • push the converter back onto the section.

This all went very smoothly. I was pleased that the connector was not glued, enabling me to take the pen apart safely and clean the components. For those with the capillary version, there will be a retaining washer gripping the cylinder on the connector. This slides forward onto the ink collector, for the cylinder to be removed for cleaning, then later slides back over the end of the cylinder again to secure it. Note also that the plastic feed is much longer in the capillary fill version.

On examining the nib, there was no date code on it. The gold cleaned up very easily. The nib appeared very slightly bent and the tine gap was rather wide, such that the pen was likely to be a gusher. Rather rashly, I squeezed the sides of the nib together, to narrow the tine gap a little, which had the desired effect. After this it was necessary to realign the tines, for smooth writing.

At the end of this exercise, I filled the pen with Waterman Serenity Blue, and tried writing on a Stalogy A5 notebook. Success! The pen writes very nicely. Whilst the generous blob of tipping suggested a Broad nib, the line is closer to a Medium.

I have much enjoyed my first day with this pen, tinkering, cleaning, photographing and writing with it. For the pleasure it gave me today, I have already got my money’s worth and so every new day with my Parker 61 will be a bonus.

14k gold, smooth and juicy.

16 thoughts on “My new (to me) Parker 61 Flighter fountain pen.

  1. Very handsome pen, indeed. It’s funny how our tastes (perhaps more accurately, our moods) about pens change. There was a time when I thought I needed no other pens than my steel, brass, and aluminum Kawecos (the plastic sports are too light for me). But then I became enamored of oversized pens made of eye-catching acrylics. Just recently, however, Kaweco’s siren song called me again and I’m back to enjoying them tremendously, and have ordered the iguana blue al sport, and the dia2 (I enjoyed your post about that pen). At least I’m glad my tastes are modest enough for my budget. Enjoy your Parker’s!

    Liked by 2 people

      1. I got the pen this afternoon and love it. The color is wild. The medium nib is wet and smooth. I think Kaweco nibs have really improved in the last year or two.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. Many thanks Paul. I have not seen the Kaweco Iguana blue in the flesh yet but it sounds great.
      I do like the look and feel of the Kaweco Dia2 as you know from my old blog post. The style calls to mind the Parker Duofold International, – especially when the cap is posted. The particularly good thing about the Kaweco Dia2 is the clever combination of materials from which it is made. I hope you enjoy yours!

      Like

  2. Congratulations on another super ebay win. I hope you have many happy days of writing together. I do like the brushed stainless steel finish, there’s something very elegant about it. Do you have a particular strategy when bidding for these pens, or just make an informed guess?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Pamela! I am enjoying my first ever Parker 61, a bit late to the party as they were discontinued 40 years ago now! As an epilogue to my post, I later discovered that, having greased the “connector” – the bit that connects the section to the barrel – which on my pen was not glued in place, there is a now a slight problem that when I go to unscrew the barrel, the connector unscrews from the section instead. You don’t want to do this as the nib, feed and ink collector are left unanchored in the section, air gets in, ink flow goes crazy and so in hindsight perhaps the silicone grease was not such a great idea after all.
      Regarding my bidding strategy on eBay (which sounds rather grand) I have sent you a reply by email.

      Like

  3. I’m right there with you on catching Parkers via eBay. Just landed a Falcon Flighter for my collection.

    I love your 61. Very good looking in that trim. I’ve never tried one of the capillary filling versions. Might be interesting, might be a nightmare, so I fully endorse the cartridge/converter option. 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Nathan. I am enjoying the Parker 61. I just have to careful when I unscrew the barrel, that the black plastic connector does not unscrew instead, as it is not glued in place. It is a lovely writer.

      Like

  4. Like the teen who refuses to watch any movie over 4 years old because it’s “too old,” so many people have missed out on the joys of vintage pens. They tend to write well right away (unlike the reputation of certain modern pens), especially Parker after the aerometric filling system came out, clean up nicely and can be used quickly, and the reputation of difficulty or the issue of replacing a sac are really not that much different than work on some modern pens. And if you hunt, they’re some of the best prices for quality instruments. Far better than a lot of modern pens.
    Congratulations on your beautiful 61! Now to find a capillary one to “complete the set.” 😁

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Paul. I agree, that a vintage Parker, with a gold nib and aerometric filler, makes a very enjoyable addition and can be great value compared to what modern pens are available for a similar price. And yes, I am rather tempted to try a Parker 61 capillary filler!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.