Empoasca vitis (smaller green leafhopper)
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Empoasca vitis (Gothe, 1875)
- Preferred Common Name
- smaller green leafhopper
- Other Scientific Names
- Chlorita flavescens not Fabricius, 1794
- Cicada flavescens
- Empoasca flavescens not Fabricius, 1794
- Empoasca pirisuga Matsumura
- International Common Names
- Englishgreen frogfly
- Spanishlorito
- Frenchpetite cicadelle verte
- Local Common Names
- GermanyHellgruene ZwergzikadeReben-ZikadeTee-Zikade
- Japanmidori-hime-yokobai
- Netherlandsgroene cicade
- EPPO code
- EMPOFL (Empoasca vitis)
Pictures
Distribution
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Host | Host status | References |
---|---|---|
Actinidia chinensis (Chinese gooseberry) | Main | |
Camellia sinensis (tea) | Unknown | Devi et al. (2016) |
Helianthus annuus (sunflower) | Unknown | Demichelis et al. (2010) |
Malus domestica (apple) | Unknown | Št'astná and Psota (2013) |
Rubus ulmifolius | Unknown | Ponti et al. (2005) |
Salix (willows) | Unknown | Demichelis et al. (2010) |
Solanum tuberosum (potato) | Other | Demichelis et al. (2010) |
Ulmus minor (European field elm) | Unknown | Ponti et al. (2005) |
Vitis (grape) | Unknown | Ponti et al. (2005) |
Vitis labrusca (fox grape) | Unknown | Duso et al. (2019) |
Vitis vinifera (grapevine) | Main | Demichelis et al. (2010) Tancik and Seljak (2017) Ponti et al. (2005) Mazzoni et al. (2001) |
Symptoms
E. vitis is a phloem-feeding leafhopper, which is unusual among the sub-family Typhlocybinae where many species are mesophyll specialists. Few signs of damage caused by feeding appear on tree hosts but feeding on grapevine and kiwi fruit causes veinal browning, as well as marginal rolling and burning, symptoms often referred to as scorching (Tavella and Arzone, 1989). Damage on these plants is proportional to the number of individuals and the duration of their stay.
List of Symptoms/Signs
Symptom or sign | Life stages | Sign or diagnosis |
---|---|---|
Plants/Leaves/abnormal colours | ||
Plants/Leaves/abnormal forms | ||
Plants/Leaves/necrotic areas |
Prevention and Control
Integrated Pest Management
Although chemical control is usually advocated for the control of E. vitis, the possibility of using the natural enemy Anagrus atomus has been discussed by a number of authors. Cultural control measures have also been studied for E. vitis. The susceptibility of plants to E. vitis can vary among different grape cultivars and action thresholds should be adjusted considering these parameters (Linder et al., 2003; Fornasiero et al., 2011).
Although chemical control is usually advocated for the control of E. vitis, the possibility of using the natural enemy Anagrus atomus has been discussed by a number of authors. Cultural control measures have also been studied for E. vitis. The susceptibility of plants to E. vitis can vary among different grape cultivars and action thresholds should be adjusted considering these parameters (Linder et al., 2003; Fornasiero et al., 2011).
Cultural Control
Plants that are not water-stressed are less likely to show symptoms, and so irrigation can play an important role in reducing infestation levels on grapevine (Fornasiero et al., 2012). Green pruning reduces leaf density, which in turn reduces E. vitis oviposition (Pavan and Picotti, 2009). Habitat management practices to promote natural enemies of E. vitis, such as intercropping, have been proposed for grapevine and other crops (Rao et al., 2012; Su et al., 2014).
Biological Control
Cerutti et al. (1991) reviewed the biology of E. vitis and its egg parasitoid Anagrus atomus in vineyards in Switzerland. The life cycle of these species involved three phases. In the first phase, adults of E. vitis moved from overwintering sites, primarily conifers, into the vineyards. The parasitoids appeared to overwinter in cicadellid eggs on roses and blackberries and completed one generation in these eggs before attacking eggs of E. vitis in vineyards. A population model with time-varying age structures and stochastic properties was constructed for the second phase of the pest life cycle. For this purpose, a time-varying distributed delay model with attrition was constructed. Given the calibrated initial density of overwintering females, the model predicted an unacceptable number of pests for the growing season. If egg parasitism by A. atomus and Stethynium triclavatum was introduced into the model as an external variable, pest densities were predicted which were below the economic threshold. In the final life-cycle phase, adults of E. vitis left the vineyards for overwintering sites. It is recommended that A. atomus should be encouraged by surrounding vineyards with plants carrying cicadellid eggs. Habitat management measures for E. vitis control could be applied to the areas surrounding vineyards.
Cerutti et al. (1991) reviewed the biology of E. vitis and its egg parasitoid Anagrus atomus in vineyards in Switzerland. The life cycle of these species involved three phases. In the first phase, adults of E. vitis moved from overwintering sites, primarily conifers, into the vineyards. The parasitoids appeared to overwinter in cicadellid eggs on roses and blackberries and completed one generation in these eggs before attacking eggs of E. vitis in vineyards. A population model with time-varying age structures and stochastic properties was constructed for the second phase of the pest life cycle. For this purpose, a time-varying distributed delay model with attrition was constructed. Given the calibrated initial density of overwintering females, the model predicted an unacceptable number of pests for the growing season. If egg parasitism by A. atomus and Stethynium triclavatum was introduced into the model as an external variable, pest densities were predicted which were below the economic threshold. In the final life-cycle phase, adults of E. vitis left the vineyards for overwintering sites. It is recommended that A. atomus should be encouraged by surrounding vineyards with plants carrying cicadellid eggs. Habitat management measures for E. vitis control could be applied to the areas surrounding vineyards.
Viggiani (2003) reported eggs of leafhoppers infesting Quercus ilex L. and brambles (Rubus spp.) hosting a large number of A. atomus in southern Italy. These leafhoppers could be used to promote the presence of A. atomus in agroecosystems.
A large number of A. atomus were collected in spring in bramble hedgerows in central Italy, where its presence has been associated with the ciccadelids Ribautiana tenerrima (Herrich-Schaffer), an alternative host of mymarid parasitodis (Ponti et al., 2003; 2005). During the summer the presence of A. atomus decreased in hedgerows but increased in vineyards because of the presence of grapevine leafhopper. In autumn the parasitoid can re-colonize brambles to overwinter in eggs of alternative hosts (Zanolli and Pavan, 2010; 2013). Other plants (such as Rosa spp. and Rubus spp.) in the surrounding vegetation can promote the abundance of E. vitis in vineyards (Van Helden and Decante, 2003; Boller, 2006; Böll et al., 2006), but this effect is of importance mostly for the first generation of E. vitis on grapevine (Decante and Van Helden 2006; 2008). Habitat management practices can favour the presence of generalist predators which have some impact on E. vitis population (Van Helden and Decante, 2003; Setenac, 2005)
Biological control by A. atomus can be influenced by grapevine cultivar traits; in particular, leaf trichome density on grapevine leaves has been negatively associated with E. vitis parasitization rate by A. atomus (Pavan and Picotti, 2009).
The use of insecticides based on entomophathogenic fungi (Beauveria bassiana) and botanicals (such as neem oil) has been tested against E. vitis, with results comparable to chemical insecticides (e.g., Feng et al., 2004; Pu et al., 2005; Sakthivel et al., 2012; Li and Lee, 2014).
Chemical Control
Due to the variable regulations around (de-)registration of pesticides, we are for the moment not including any specific chemical control recommendations. For further information, we recommend you visit the following resources:
•
EU pesticides database (http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/)
•
PAN pesticide database (www.pesticideinfo.org)
•
Your national pesticide guide
Impact
Although E. vitis is considered to be a significant pest, there have been few assessments of crop loss caused by the leafhopper. The second generation of this pest is considered to be the most important in terms of damage to plants (Pavan et al., 2000; Jermini et al., 2009). Symptoms of E. vitis are different among cultivars, with leaf margins typically turning reddish in red cultivars and yellowish in white cultivars. Infestation can also cause the leaf lamina to partially dry out. Higher oviposition rate were positively correlated with leaf density (Pavan and Picotti, 2009). At similar E. vitis infestation levels, water availability can influence the impact of the pest, with higher symptoms levels in water-stressed plants (Pavan et al., 2000).
Candolfi et al. (1993) conducted field studies in Switzerland during 1991 to determine the impact of E. vitis on leaf gas exchange, plant growth, yield, fruit quality and carbohydrate reserves in grapes. Gas exchange was measured on the discoloured (red) and the green parts of infested main leaves, and on leaves from uninfested vines. Photosynthesis and mesophyll conductance were severely reduced on main leaves showing feeding symptoms. The stomatal conductance of the red leaf section of infested main leaves was lower than on undamaged control leaves. The red leaf section of infested main leaves showed lower transpiration rates than those of the green parts of the same leaves or of undamaged control leaves. The gas exchange processes of lateral leaves were not affected by feeding. The number of E. vitis on main leaves was correlated with visual estimates of damage symptoms. At 71.8 E. vitis-days/leaf, up to 40% of the main leaf area of infested plants was discoloured from the borders toward the centre. Lateral leaves showed no feeding symptoms. Shoot diameter, pruning weight and carbohydrate reserves in the wood were not affected by E. vitis. Lateral leaf area growth was significantly stimulated on plants infested by E. vitis. No decreases in yield and fruit quality were observed with leafhopper-loads up to 71.8 E. vitis-days/leaf. However, in other situations high infestation levels were associated with yield losses and sugar content reduction (Pavan et al., 2000).
E. vitis is also reported to be an important pest of tea (Camellia sinensis) in Asia (e.g. Adarsh et al., 2002; Hazarika et al., 2009). Xu et al. (2005) proposed economic thresholds. The impact of the insect on tea is variable among tea cultivars (Huang et al., 1998) and in case of severe attack a yield reductions of up to 30% have been reported (Xu et al., 2005). Using the electrical penetration graph (EPG) technique, Jin et al. (2012) studied the feeding mechanism of E. vitis on tea and suggested that the leafhopper acts as a cell rupture feeder.
The early introduction of leafhoppers to single plants in cages significantly reduced the yield of potato tubers (Rygg, 1981).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 16 November 2021
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.