Abstract
The anti-fracking movement in Bulgaria, 2011–2013, was a successful grassroots effort to influence national environmental policy. The study draws on discourse theory to explore and describe how citizens interpreted and presented a complex technology and legitimated their participation in the expert and political deliberations on fracking policies. Data were collected from semi-structured interviews with activists and movement documents. Structured and open coding followed by qualitative analyses produced descriptions and explanations of technology discourses. The anti-fracking activists elaborated and engaged in three technology discourses: lateral, literal, and reflexive. Each discourse had specific elements, meaning-making mechanisms, and strategic benefits and implications. The discourses served different epistemological and political purposes at different phases of the movement and were instrumental in its eventual success. The study shows the importance of technological discourses for democratic participation in political decisions that concern the health and livelihood of communities. The technological discourse of issues can be an ostensibly apolitical barrier to citizen participation, rendering decisions arcane and restricted to experts. Therefore, citizens and communities must actively and strategically engage in a discursive politics of knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to the need to protect the privacy and anonymity of the research participants. Data are available in their qualitative-coded form from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Raw data (interviews) are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and pending additional individual consent from each participant.
References
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a New Modernity (1 edition.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
Callon, M. (2005). Disabled persons of all Countries, Unite! In W. P (Ed.), Making things Public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 308–313). MIT Press.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (Second edition.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Christens, B. D., & Speer, P. W. (2015). Community Organizing: Practice, Research, and Policy Implications. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12014
Christens, B. D., Winn, L. T., & Duke, A. M. (2016). Empowerment and critical consciousness: A conceptual cross-fertilization. Adolescent Research Review, 1(1), 15–27.
Colborn, T., Kwiatkowski, C., Schultz, K., & Bachran, M. (2011). Natural Gas Operations from a Public Health Perspective. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 17(5), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2011.605662
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263
Dryzek, J. S. (2005). The politics of the Earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford University Press.
Dutta, M. J. (2016). Cultural Context, Structural Determinants, and Global Health Inequities: The Role of Communication. Frontiers in Communication, 1. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2016.00005
Eyal, G. (2010). From the sociology of Intellectuals to the sociology of interventions. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102625
Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Duke University Press.
Fischer, F., Miller, G., & Sidney, M. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods. CRC Press.
Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Clarendon Press.
Höijer, B. (2011). Social representations theory. Nordicom Review, 32(2), 3–16.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018). Special report: Global warming of 1.5°C. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
Jacquet, J. B. (2014). Review of Risks to Communities from Shale Energy Development. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(15), 8321–8333. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404647x
Jacquet, J. B., & Stedman, R. C. (2014). The risk of social-psychological disruption as an impact of energy development and environmental change. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(9), 1285–1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.820174
Johnson, E. W., & Frickel, S. (2011). Ecological threat and the Founding of U.S. National Environmental Movement Organizations, 1962–1998. Social Problems, 58(3), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2011.58.3.305
Johnston, H. (2002). Verification and proof in frame and discourse analysis. In B. Klandermans, & S. Staggenborg (Eds.), Methods of social movements research (pp. 62–91). University of Minnesota Press.
Kasperson, R. E., & Stallen, P. J. M. (Eds.). (1991). Communicating risks to the Public: International Perspectives. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). Chicago University Press.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc.
McCammon, H. J. (2012). The U.S. Women’s Jury Movements and Strategic Adaptation: A More Just Verdict (Illustrated edition). Cambridge University Press.
McLachlan, C. (2009). You don’t do a chemistry experiment in your best china’: Symbolic interpretations of place and technology in a wave energy case. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5342–5350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.057
Mihaylov, N. L. (2020). From victims to citizens: Emerging activist identities in the anti-fracking movement in Bulgaria. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(2), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22258
Mihaylov, N. L. (2021). Speaking power to power: Grassroots democracy in the anti-fracking movement in Bulgaria. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(8), 3054–3078. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22358
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations. Explorations in social psychology. Polity Press.
Nelson, G. (2013). Community psychology and transformative policy change in the neo-liberal era. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52(3–4), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9591-5
Orr, M. (Ed.). (2007). Transforming the city: Community organizing and the challenge of political change. University Press of Kansas.
Rootes, C. (2007). Acting locally: The character, contexts and significance of local environmental mobilisations. Environmental Politics, 16(5), 722–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701640460
Rootes, C. (2013). From local conflict to national issue: When and how environmental campaigns succeed in transcending the local. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755791
Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.
Saldana, J. (2015). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers Third Edition (3rd edition). Sage Publications Ltd.
Smith, K. K. (1983). A role for community psychologists: As participant-conceptualizers. Australian Psychologist, 18(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050068308256249
Speer, P. W., Hughey, J., Gensheimer, L. K., & Adams-Leavitt, W. (1995). Organizing for power: A comparative case study. Journal of Community Psychology, 23(1), 57–73.
Stasik, A. (2018). Global controversies in local settings: Anti-fracking activism in the era of web 2.0. Journal of Risk Research, 21(12), 1562–1578. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1313759
Steinberg, M. W. (1999). The talk and back talk of collective action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse among Nineteenth-Century English Cotton Spinners. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 736–780. https://doi.org/10.1086/210359
Swanstrom, T., & Banks, B. (2009). Going Regional. Community-based regionalism, transportation, and local hiring agreements. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), 355–367.
Wood, R. L. (2007). Higher power: Strategic Capacity for State and National Organizing. In M. Orr (Ed.), Transforming the city: Community organizing and the challenge of political change (pp. 162–192). University Press of Kansas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mihaylov, N.L. Meaning-making as Empowerment: Technology Discourses in the Anti-fracking Movement in Bulgaria. Hum Ecol 51, 529–546 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00425-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00425-w